Newmont – Suriname Jobs – On This Page

Looking for:

Jobs usa gov federal jobs nearest upside
Click here to ENTER

If your looking for a US Government job in your home state or an US Government job overseas, our government job listings and email alerts will provide timely, accurate updates of new job vacancies.

Select from the following state, country, or continent US Government job listings. Custom job listings based on your zip code or keyword are available too. Nonspecific US Locations. United States Government Jobs.

Alaska Federal Jobs. Alabama Federal Jobs. Arkansas Federal Jobs. American Samoa Federal Jobs. Arizona Federal Jobs. California Federal Jobs. Colorado Federal Jobs. Connecticut Federal Jobs. District Of Columbia Federal Jobs. Delaware Federal Jobs. Florida Federal Jobs. Micronesia Federal Jobs.

Georgia Federal Jobs. Guam Federal Jobs. Hawaii Federal Jobs. Iowa Federal Jobs. Idaho Federal Jobs. Illinois Federal Jobs. Indiana Federal Jobs. Kansas Federal Jobs. Kentucky Federal Jobs. Louisiana Federal Jobs. Massachusetts Federal Jobs. Maryland Federal Jobs.

Maine Federal Jobs. Marshall Islands Federal Jobs. Michigan Federal Jobs. Minnesota Federal Jobs. Missouri Federal Jobs. Northern Mariana Islands Federal Jobs. Mississippi Federal Jobs. Montana Federal Jobs. North Carolina Federal Jobs. North Dakota Federal Jobs. Nebraska Federal Jobs. New Hampshire Federal Jobs. New Jersey Federal Jobs. New Mexico Federal Jobs. Nevada Federal Jobs. New York Federal Jobs. Ohio Federal Jobs.

Oklahoma Federal Jobs. Oregon Federal Jobs. Pennsylvania Federal Jobs. Puerto Rico Federal Jobs. Palau Federal Jobs. Rhode Island Federal Jobs. South Carolina Federal Jobs. South Dakota Federal Jobs. Tennessee Federal Jobs. Texas Federal Jobs.

Utah Federal Jobs. Virginia Federal Jobs. Virgin Islands Federal Jobs. Vermont Federal Jobs. Washington Federal Jobs. Wisconsin Federal Jobs. West Virginia Federal Jobs. Wyoming Federal Jobs. Angola Federal Government Jobs. Burkina Faso Federal Government Jobs. Burundi Federal Government Jobs. Benin Federal Government Jobs.

Botswana Federal Government Jobs. Congo Federal Government Jobs. Cameroon Federal Government Jobs. Cape Verde Federal Government Jobs. Djibouti Federal Government Jobs. Algeria Federal Government Jobs. Egypt Federal Government Jobs. Western Sahara Federal Government Jobs.

Eritrea Federal Government Jobs. Ethiopia Federal Government Jobs. Gabon Federal Government Jobs. Ghana Federal Government Jobs. Gambia Federal Government Jobs. Guinea Federal Government Jobs. Equatorial Guinea Federal Government Jobs. Guinea Bissau Federal Government Jobs. Kenya Federal Government Jobs. Comoros Federal Government Jobs. Liberia Federal Government Jobs.

Lesotho Federal Government Jobs. Morocco Federal Government Jobs. Madagascar Federal Government Jobs. Mali Federal Government Jobs.

Mauritania Federal Government Jobs. Malawi Federal Government Jobs. Mozambique Federal Government Jobs. Namibia Federal Government Jobs. Niger Federal Government Jobs. Nigeria Federal Government Jobs. Rwanda Federal Government Jobs. Seychelles Federal Government Jobs.

– Job Seeker Services – Job Search Results – Federal Government Employment

Email: alleganyent alleganyco. Phone: Fax: The program is designed to provide financial assistance to individuals who need classroom training in order to gain skills that will improve their employment opportunities in high-growth occupations. If you are interested in getting your high school equivalency diploma or pursuing other employment-related training or financial aid, please visit the Adult Education link below.

Our Business Service Representative will help you understand the network of resources and no-cost programs and services available that can save your business time and money. You can direct applicants to apply at a One Stop Center instead of your place of business. We can pre-screen applicants according to your minimum qualifications e. Only applications that meet your criteria will be forwarded to you for review.

If you prefer to interview candidates in a neutral setting, we can provide space at no charge to you. We also host job fairs and hiring events. This seems to be a central fact of much US policy making, in the sense that it seems to contribute heavily to many other trends:. Should policymakers expand their staff capacity, to spread out their work?

These two detailed EA Forum posts have lots of great info on Congress. People usually think of working in Congress as working for a Congress member or committee. A staffer explains that partisanship is what usually kills people—people get burned out on wanting to accomplish something and having that fail sometimes at the last moment for frustrating reasons of partisan politics.

What are the different roles in a Congressional office? See footnote. The executive branch is where most of the money and people in government are.

The Department of Defense is a very big part of it. Here are just a few of the many spheres in the executive branch. Agencies outside of the White House matter; a government official recounts that many decisions in the White House are deliberated on in and had most important aspects of decided in sub-agencies. See this other post for lots of great, relevant info on think tanks.

An additional detail: one speaker mentioned that the think tank where they work uses reports mostly as excuses to get meetings with policymakers. The think tank and its employees use their relationships with people who work with the policymaker to get these meetings.

Some US states and cities let people run ballot initiatives: people can propose legislative changes, and if these proposals get enough signatures from people in that jurisdiction and are within the scope of what ballot initiatives are allowed to do in that jurisdiction , they go on the ballot for voters to vote on in the next election.

Currently, long-term-oriented work in running ballot initiatives and related activities is very young, so it involves lots of trying new things and trying to think of new adaptations of ideas.

Roughly, lobbying means asking government officials to make or change government policies. Your chances of having a large social impact by working in AI policy is highly uncertain. You would be intentionally taking a big, low probability bet, not just with regard to your own contribution which is generally uncertain in any cause , but also with regard to the overall case that this area is promising to work in. But over a whole career, people who are very strong fits seem likely to have numerous huge wins.

A speaker notes: Impact is highly dependent on fit. In just a few years, at least a handful of people who are very concerned with improving the impacts of emerging technologies have reached positions in the US government from which they are well-placed to contribute. We heard from three speakers in the executive branch; of the two who discussed their impact so far:.

Another speaker, over the course of just a few months, very plausibly counterfactually secured billions of dollars in government spending for a cause most of us would agree is very important.

Another speaker made a case that they have a nontrivial chance of having swung a very influential election. Caveat: there were significant selection and attention effects going on—I was disproportionately likely to hear from, hear about, and remember people with unusually impactful US policy careers that is, unusually impactful even for people in this community, which is already trying to be unusually impactful. But that caveat is mainly applicable to the first two bullet points above; the others still make a strong case.

How can I make it happen? Improving the allocation of funding [11]. For a few additional details, see footnote. This part of the EA Forum posts mentioned earlier has some great discussion of this. Broadly, working in Congress can be a promising path to positive impact because Congressional action is necessary for some important policy changes.

After all, Congress has a monopoly on some influential powers e. As a rule of thumb, big, bold, long-term change tends to require Congressional action. If you want to get something done, the best way is usually to get it into one of these kinds of bills:. Big spending bills [13]. See this section of the other forum post for more discussion of this dynamic. See footnote for additional details. People in power have no time to think; the think tanks do it for them—they make the ideas and hand them to them.

Broadly, think tanks have two paths to influence:. As an example of the latter, one think tank corrected the misconception that China was far outspending the US on AI spending. They might read a 1-page executive summary in your report, or tell one of their staff to read your report. Making connections, by getting to know people as sources [15]. A political data scientist sees three main ways in which their work has been positively impactful:.

Helping politicians of one political party get elected: [19]. Thinking of new ideas : In collaboration with a few others, this data scientist drew on their expertise to think of new things they could help make happen. Political data analytics work can involve less counterfactual impact, e. For more details, see the section on personal fit for political data analysts.

An old 80, Hours article estimates, with significant guesswork, that Congressional staffers who are interested in becoming a Congress member have about a 1 in 40 chance of doing so, [20] while interested top law school graduates have about a 1 in 10 chance.

If you manage to win federal elected office e. This is because many people reading this would have both the personal assets and the political wiggle room to help solve pressing problems. A professional with relevant experience explains that, while there are plenty of good-hearted people in office, Congress is in short supply of people with certain qualities: people who are evidence minded, careful thinkers, who care about the consequences of their actions, and who have strong truth-seeking drives, as well as people who can prioritize time and effort based on considerations of scale, neglectedness, and tractability.

As discussed above, elected Congress members—especially those in safe states—are very safe in primaries and general elections. Comfortable prospects of reelection give elected officials some wiggle room in what they do.

For example, politicians can often choose whether to be allies or champions of causes. Plenty of politicians in fact do this spend some political capital on obscure bills. Still, ballot initiative campaigns can be powerful levers for city-level and state-level change there are no nationwide ballot initiatives. Ballot initiatives may be promising tools or inconvenient thorns?

It would be easy for such ballot initiatives to accidentally cause harm e. What does one need to run a ballot initiative campaign that has lots of positive impact? According to someone who has done this, a campaign director should coordinate several kinds of domain experts, to draw on legal, political, issue-specific, and campaign expertise—see footnote for more details. In addition to the above coordination, you need funding, and you need to actually run the initiative e.

Some issues—especially those for which potential benefits would be highly diffused—have many people willing to be allies, but few or no champions, i. Leadership, design, human meta communication, critical thinking, motivating, cooperating, innovating. In my black-and-white moments I say: Skip all knowledge training in high schools. We make you better than a robot. We let you cooperate with robots. We build your self-trust. We turn you into a decent, polite, social person.

And most importantly, we do not mix education with religion — never. The subject-matter-specific part of a B. A large part of this time is spent not in a classroom but becoming fluent through monitored practice, including group work, internships and other high-intensity, high-interaction apprentice-like programs.

There are possibilities for adding limited skill sets to otherwise qualified workers, e. Jobs that seem viable may fall victim to a surprising development in automation see, for example, filmmaking ; new categories of work may not last long enough to support large numbers of employees. Automation and semi-automation e. Training is useful but not the end of education — only a kind of education.

As for sipping: you need not know the name of every bear to know you should avoid bears. Yet the continual construction of knowledge and cultures requires more from us. So far, training formally as in Kahn Academy and Lynda. No programmer or developer could keep up without the informal training of Stack Overflow. No need for debate. A little information sip will let us know. But what is left out? Collaborative construction of knowledge in new areas, deeper investigation into known areas, and the discovery of entirely new areas of knowledge.

This is our challenge: how to create wisdom from knowledge, not just jobs from training and information. Today programming is increasingly become a trade. The problem with many websites is not so much the training of the programmers as much as getting managers and C-level people who understand the new concepts of a world being redefined by software. We need to think about co-evolving work and workers.

And, as always, critical thinking will remain the biggest challenge. Rigorous science and humanities courses help students learn how to learn.

Skills training all too often does not. Of course, it can complement core academic courses, and is likely to be part of a lifetime of learning for those switching occupations. But turning high school and college into narrow vocational education programs would make their graduates more vulnerable to robotic replacement, not less. We need to invest in higher education, shoring up support for traditional universities and colleges, lest they eventually become bastions for reproduction of an elite, leaving the rest of society to untested experiments or online programs.

Online learning is a good complement for existing colleges — but cannot replace them. Online-only programs emphasize the upside of high-tech approaches, but rarely grapple with the downside. Big-data surveillance will track the work students do, ostensibly in order to customize learning. Get stuck on a lesson? Just keep interfacing with a keyboard, camera and perhaps haptic sensors.

Just let cameras record your every move and keystroke — perhaps your eye movements and facial expressions, too. They will just verify that student X can do task Y. It could be a very profitable business. If students pay less for actual instruction by experts, they have more money to spend on badges. This is the for-profit model — shift money away from instruction and amenities and toward administrator salaries and marketing. There are serious worries about rapid centralization and reuse of student data by under-regulated firms.

How individuals develop the skills will be less important [than] having the skills. As mastery learning evolves, so will our performance-based assessment systems, providing universities and businesses a greater set of evidence and qualifications then is currently available. K teachers are constantly pulled from class time with students for professional development or during class are required to take attendance, [complete] grade assessments, fill out grade checks, practice fire drills — all degrading quality teaching time.

If online systems just removed these barriers they would be a great benefit, but there is so much more these systems can offer. Many of the new skills necessary for jobs of the future require digital skills to be successful.

Too often education leaders and politicians make unilateral decisions about the interaction between teacher and learner instead of building and maintaining an environment for great teaching and learning to take place. Three dynamics that will affect all learning and retraining efforts: 1 Newer tools are changing our sense of identity. Everyone in a technology-based profession will need to be a quant [ quantitative analyst ] or keep up with the quants. Because all human processes and activities can now be quantified, and there is considerable exploration and technology development in the application of quantification to everything from our sleep patterns and shopping habits to our emotions and online behaviors, many new and important business models are emerging from quantification and the learning algorithms that drive it.

Said simply, the greatest skill will be the ability to think through the cloud of facts, data, experience and strategic direction that products and services require.

Design thinking or visual thinking will be a critical part of managing a data-driven world. Data mining and management can be taught effectively. Thinking, problem-solving, reflection and visioning are difficult to teach at scale. It offers a more true moving score.

But platforms like Coursera can amplify the talents of gifted and effective instructors and reduce the cost of education in the coming decade for all.

Some schools and colleges will thrive and prosper at a level not seen in their history. The greatest thinker of the 21st century, [whoever] he or she is, will understand more about how she thinks and learns than any student in any previous generation, and all before ever stepping foot inside a schoolhouse.

Imagine for a moment the power of knowing beforehand how well you would perform on a test. Telemetric education also offers the opportunity for everyone to raise his or her hand and be heard. This whole argument is a sham meant to attack the fundamental purpose and basis of education. A wide range of activities may enable skills to be learned — especially multidisciplinary skills, such as critical thinking or social interaction — without specifically teaching those skills.

Of course, they will continue to require the time and participation of the individual learner, and in many cases, social interaction with other learners, but the labor-intensive learning industry we have developed to this point will not be required. However, in 10 years it will be arguable and probably demonstrable that your own computer networks will know you better than any individual instructor could, even an instructor who worked with you your entire life.

Sure, there are disasters like the Facebook news stream, but people are already amazed at how much Google knows about them. And we know that with enough data analytics can outperform humans even in complex tasks. Most actual assessment not to be confused with multiple-choice tests in school or professional programs is based on expert recognition. The submitted behavior an essay, performance in surgery, piloting an aircraft in a simulation is not assessed according to whether a set of indicators is achieved this would possibly be a necessary, but never a sufficient, condition.

The expert looks at the overall behavior and assesses whether that competency has been met. The expert is serving as a proxy for the community at large. With modern communications technology, this proxy is no longer required. Each person responds to them in some way, not by testing them, but by for example engaging them in conversation, asking questions, following advice, etc.

These responses, over time, form a comprehensive and constantly changing assessment of the person. How will autonomous factories in Chicago, U. What credentialing system will self-driving cars require? How will artificially intelligent laborers learn the skills needed to run a household, business, government institution, or political organization?

When will universities allow artilect [ nonhuman artificial-intelligence ] students to enroll in their traditional undergraduate and graduate degree programs, and how would students learn the more ephemeral skills like critical thinking from a thinking machine? About Pew Research Center Pew Research Center is a nonpartisan fact tank that informs the public about the issues, attitudes and trends shaping the world.

It conducts public opinion polling, demographic research, media content analysis and other empirical social science research. Pew Research Center does not take policy positions. It is a subsidiary of The Pew Charitable Trusts. Newsletters Press Donate My Account. There’s more than one way to shatter a stereotype and find six-figure government jobs.

Financial Samurai says these five federal agencies stand out for the average salary they pay, which are rounded up to the nearest thousand here:. For this, you may find direction in a Best Places to Work ranking of federal agencies.

Employees were asked:. Department of Commerce www.

Jobs usa gov federal jobs nearest upside. Accessibility Tools

 
 
Find a Federal Government Job | USAGov.